Performative Remorse and the Erosion of Trust: Rethinking Apology Rhetoric in Contemporary Brand Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t7084Abstract
In contemporary brand communication, apologies are increasingly issued in the absence of actual wrongdoing, functioning as strategic and symbolic gestures rather than mechanisms of moral repair. This paper examines the rise of performative apologies and their implications for trust, authenticity, and accountability in organizational communication. Grounded in Situational Crisis Communication Theory and employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study analyzes five publicly posted mock apology messages that share similar structures, tones, and communicative intents. Using Fairclough’s three-level CDA framework, the analysis explores how apology language is linguistically constructed, discursively circulated, and socially normalized outside crisis contexts. Findings reveal that these messages systematically imitate the genre of genuine apologies while avoiding responsibility, blending apology discourse with promotional narratives, and reframing accountability as performance. This normalization of simulated remorse contributes to apology fatigue, public skepticism, and the erosion of the moral authority of apologies. The paper argues that the strategic misuse of apology rhetoric undermines organizational authenticity and weakens the capacity of apologies to repair trust during genuine crises. The study contributes to scholarship on crisis communication, discourse, and organizational ethics by highlighting the need to restore proportionality, sincerity, and accountability in apology practices.
Keywords: Performative apologies; Critical Discourse Analysis; organizational trust.
References
Ashktorab, Z., Buccella, A., D’Cruz, J., Fowler, Z., Gill, A., Leung, K. Y., Magnus, P. D., Richards, J., & Varshney, K. R. (2025). Who's sorry now: User preferences among rote, empathic, and explanatory apologies from LLM chatbots. arXiv.org.
Bentley, J. M. (2024). Devaluing public apologies in the age of social media.
Brooks, A., Dai, H., & Schweitzer, M. (2014). I am sorry about the rain. Superfluous apologies demonstrate empathic concern and increase trust.
Cai, Y., Chu, Y., Xu, Z., & Liu, P. (2025). To apologize or not to apologize. Trust repair after automated vehicles’ mistakes. Transportation Research Record.
Chung, A. Y. (2018). Examining the effectiveness of using CSR communication in apology statements after bad publicity.
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Situational Crisis Communication Theory.
Fischer, Y. (2013). The effectiveness of company’s response strategies to negative publicity in social media.
Hornsey, M., Chapman, C., La Macchia, S. T., & Loakes, J. (2024). Corporate apologies are effective because reform signals are weighted more heavily than culpability signals. Journal of Business Research.
Islam, Z. B. (2018). To apologize or not to apologize. How organizations should respond to executive employees’ private life misconduct.
Li, L. Z., & Soule, S. (2023). The power of public confession. Mobilization and reputation effects of disclosing socially irresponsible performance. SSRΝ.
MacLachlan, A. (2015). Trust me, I am sorry. The paradox of public apology.
Mehta, A. M., Tam, L., Greer, D. A., & Letheren, K. (2020). Before crisis. How near-miss affects organizational trust and industry transference. Public Relations Review.
Pacheco, N. A., Pizzutti, C., Basso, K., & Vaerenbergh, Y. V. (2019). Trust recovery tactics after double deviation. Better sooner than later. Journal of Service Management.
Paramitha, V., Tan, S. Z., & Lim, W. M. (2025). Undoing greenwashing. The roles of greenwashing severity, consumer forgiveness, growth beliefs, and apology sincerity. Journal of Product and Brand Management.
Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. F. (2013). When humanizing brands goes wrong. The detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings.
Rhodes, E. S. (2016). Conceptualizing cross-border differences in MNC apologies as a strategic response to culture.
Rhodes, E., Clarke, S., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2025). The impact of proximity on trust restoration from an organizational apology. Management and Economics Review.
Shao, W., Moffett, J. W., Quach, S., Surachartkumtonkun, J., Thaichon, P., Weaven, S., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Toward a theory of corporate apology. Mechanisms, contingencies, and strategies. European Journal of Marketing.
Spencer, L. G. (2021). National Geographic’s racial apology. A half-performative. Western Journal of Communication.
Tsarenko, Y., & Tojib, D. (2015). Consumers’ forgiveness after brand transgression. The effect of corporate social responsibility and response.
Tong, Z., Feng, J., & Liu, F. (2022). Understanding damage to and reparation of brand trust. A closer look at image congruity in the context of negative publicity. Journal of Product and Brand Management.
Waseem, M. A., & Kamal, M. F. (2024). Mending the image. The role of crisis communication and apology strategies in recovering from brand transgressions. Journal of Asian Development Studies.
Yadav, T. (2024). Navigating cancel culture. PR and marketing tactics for brand reputation management.
Yang, K. (2024). How to rebuild trust through apology. Evidence from public apology letters. Journal of Pragmatics.
Yang, K. H. (2022). How sajiao wins forgiveness. The effectiveness of emojis in rebuilding trust through apology. Discourse and Communication.
Zhang, Q. (2025). Relational versus instrumental pathways of apology. The roles of performative sincerity, strategic presentation, and trust restoration.
