National Culture as a Conditioning Context for Dynamic Capabilities: A Multi-Level Filtering Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2544Abstract
Dynamic capabilities are central to strategic management, yet the theory remains hampered by a "universalist" bias that treats organizational adaptation as a culturally neutral, technical process. This paper challenges this assumption by developing a contextualized framework that identifies national culture as a critical conditioning context for the enactment of dynamic capabilities. By integrating the GLOBE framework with the microfoundations of strategy, we theorize how cultural logics, specifically power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and institutional collectivism, filter managerial cognition and the organizational routines necessary for sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring resources. We move beyond "culture-as-variable" models to explain how cultural logic provides the social legitimacy required for capability deployment. This research contributes to the microfoundations movement and the Attention-Based View (ABV) by explaining why identical strategic routines yield heterogeneous results across different social contexts, offering a more robust, context-sensitive theory of firm adaptation.
Keywords: Dynamic capabilities; National culture; Contextualization; Power distance; Uncertainty avoidance; Institutional collectivism
References
Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1413
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2016). Adapting to environmental turbulence: A capabilities-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2504
Gavetti, G. (2012). PERSPECTIVE—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0644
Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47(8), 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
Johns, G. (2017). Reflections on the 2016 Decade Award: Incorporating context in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0044
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ917>3.0.CO;2-K
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
