Land as Relationship, Not Property: The Politics of Land Justice among the Lugbara of Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2618Abstract
Contemporary gender and development programs in Sub-Saharan Africa often rely on Eurocentric frameworks that view gender solely through the lens of patriarchal dominance, frequently overlooking the nuance of indigenous safety nets. This article challenges these binary models by examining how customary land stewardship systems inform male participation and household livelihood resilience in Uganda. Drawing on qualitative doctoral field data from Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, the study utilizes an Indigenous Narrative Research Design (INRD) consisting of Kwete sharing circles, council of elders’ dialogues, key informant interviews, and Parish Development Model (PDM) group narrative sessions. The 77 participants comprised of 39 women and 38 men. The empirical evidence reveals that customary Lugbara land distribution is inherently relational rather than exclusively male-dominated. Historically, land access and usage rights flowed through matri-central allocations and maternal lineage provisions, embedding vital social safety nets for vulnerable or returning women. This customary architecture stands in direct tension with recent national legal instruments, particularly the Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022, which enforces individualistic, gender-neutral statutory divisions. However, top-down statutory legal interventions and external rights-focused programming have inadvertently disrupted this architecture, correlating locally with rising marital separation, land litigation, and the marginalization of young men from land access. By centering the indigenous philosophy of Ama-tualu (relational interconnectedness), this article argues for a paradigm shift away from adversarial, individualized land tenure models toward relational gender reciprocity. Ultimately, the study proposes a braided model of legal recognition that codifies indigenous safety-net obligations rather than displacing them, offering a transferable framework for rethinking gendered land security across agrarian Sub-Saharan Africa.
Keywords: Ama-tualu; Customary Land Tenure; Indigenous Narrative Research Design; Lugbara; Livelihood Resilience; Uganda.
References
Adoko, J., & Levine, S. (2008). How can we turn legal provisions into lived realities? Enforcing women’s land rights in Uganda. Land and Equity Movement in Uganda (LEMU).
Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Berry, S. (1993). No condition is permanent: The social dynamics of agrarian change in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of Wisconsin Press.
Chanock, M. (1985). Law, custom, and social order: The colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge University Press.
Chilisa, B. (2020). Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Constitutional Court of Uganda. (2007). Law & Advocacy for Women in Uganda v. Attorney General (Constitutional Petitions No. 13 of 2005 & No. 5 of 2006) UGCC 1.
Cornwall, A. (2016). Women’s empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359.
Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection (IDS Working Paper 232). Institute of Development Studies.
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.
Meinzen-Dick, R., & Mwangi, E. (2009). Cutting the web of interests: Pitfalls of formalizing property rights. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 36–43.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Peters, P. E. (2004). Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 269–314.
Platteau, J. P. (1996). The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1), 29–86.
Republic of Uganda. (1995). Constitution of the Republic of Uganda. Government Printer.
Republic of Uganda. (1998). The Land Act, Cap 227. Government Printer.
Republic of Uganda. (2022). The Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022. Government Printer.
Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.
Silberschmidt, M. (2001). Disempowerment of men in rural and urban East Africa: Implications for male mate selection and sexual behavior. World Development, 29(4), 657–671.
Tripp, A. M. (2004). Women’s movements and land rights in Uganda: The challenge of modernizing feminism. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 20(1), 1–19.
von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2002). Who’s afraid of legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 34(47), 37–82.
Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy discourses on women’s land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The implications of the return to the customary. Journal of Agrarian Change, 3(1–2), 67–112.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Article metrics
Downloads: 13
