Moderating Role of Government Policy on the Relationship Between Digital Transformation Practices and Public Service Delivery Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Huduma Centres in Nairobi Metropolitan Area, Kenya

Authors

  • Maxwell Okeyo Daystar University
  • Dr. Justice Nzioki Daystar University
  • Dr. Sylvia Tuikong Daystar University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5426

Abstract

The study examined the moderating effect of government policy on the relationship between digital transformation practices, namely technological infrastructure, digital competencies, and process automation, and public service delivery effectiveness among Huduma Centres in the Nairobi Metropolitan Area, Kenya. The research was based on a pragmatic philosophical paradigm and informed by institutional theory. An explanatory mixed-methods approach was adopted and the population was 13,796 respondents in nine Huduma Centres in Nairobi, Kiambu, Machakos and Kajiado counties. A stratified sampling approach based on Cochran's formula provided a sample of 549 respondents. Primary data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires, reliability and validity were ensured using Cronbach's alpha, factor analysis and expert validation. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and hierarchical regression according to the three-step moderation model of Baron and Kenny, and qualitative data were analysed with thematic analysis. The study found that digital transformation practices collectively explained 62.1% of the variance in service delivery effectiveness (R² = 0.621, F = 73.282, p = 0.000). Government policy significantly moderated the relationship between digital transformation practices and service delivery effectiveness, increasing explanatory power from 66.9% to 81.6% when interaction terms were introduced, representing a 14.7 percentage point increase (R² = 0.816, F = 82.214, p = 0.000). The strongest interaction effect was observed between process automation and government policy (β = 0.495, p = 0.000). Qualitative findings confirmed that centres with stronger Masterplan alignment reported better resource availability and more consistent service quality, while unequal budget allocations and low enforcement capacity constrained policy's direct influence. The study concludes that government policy is a significant institutional moderator that amplifies the effectiveness of digital transformation practices on public service delivery effectiveness, yet systematic gaps in enforcement, funding, and compliance monitoring require immediate institutional intervention. The study recommends that the Ministry of ICT strengthen Masterplan accountability frameworks, that the ICT Authority establish dedicated policy compliance monitoring mechanisms, and that the National Treasury introduce performance-based funding incentives to ensure consistent and equitable policy-driven digital transformation outcomes across all Huduma Centres.

Keywords: Government policy, Digital Transformation Practices, Public Service delivery effectiveness Huduma Centres in Kenya

Author Biographies

Maxwell Okeyo, Daystar University

PhD student, Daystar University

Dr. Justice Nzioki , Daystar University

Lecturer, Daystar University

Dr. Sylvia Tuikong, Daystar University

Lecturer, Daystar University

References

Alharbi, J., Atkins, A., & Stanier, C. (2021). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption in government: Institutional theory perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09949-5

Auditor General. (2023). Report of the Auditor-General on National Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies for the year ended 30th June 2022. Office of the Auditor-General, Republic of Kenya. https://www.oagkenya.go.ke/reports

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Battilana, J., Baclawski, K., & Besharov, M. L. (2017). Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 93–138. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0127

Baughan, N., Whitney, H. M., Drukker, K., Sahiner, B., Hu, T., Kim, G. H., McNitt-Gray, M., Myers, K. J., & Giger, M. L. (2023). Sequestration of imaging studies in MIDRC: Stratified sampling to balance demographic characteristics of patients in a multi-institutional data common. Journal of Medical Imaging, 10(06). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.6.064501

Bukhala, G. K., & Njoroge, J. (2021). Organization culture and strategic plan implementation in Huduma Centers: A case of Huduma Centre in Central Business District, Nairobi, Kenya. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2021/v9/i3/hs2103-046

Bwalya, K. J., & Mutula, S. (2022). Digital policy readiness in Zambia and Botswana. Cross-sectional survey study.

Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications.

Chewa, J., Minja, D., & Njoroge, J. G. (2023). Moderating effect of working environment on government bureaucracy and service delivery effectiveness in state owned enterprises in the energy sector in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 9(4), 1–20.

Clarke, E., & Visser, J. (2019). Pragmatic research methodology in education: Possibilities and pitfalls. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(5), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1524866

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2019). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Filgueiras, F., Flávio, C., & Palotti, P. (2019). Digital transformation and public services in Brazil. Federal government study.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., et al. (2020). Legislative foundations of smart governance. Qualitative policy review.

Gupta, A., et al. (2023). Institutional support, legal mandates and digital service assimilation in public administration. Applied governance study.

ICT Authority. (2022). Kenya Digital Masterplan 2022–2032. Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy.

Janssen, M., & Van den Hoven, J. (2021). Digital governance and responsive policy environments. Mixed-methods OECD study.

Karama, J. (2022). Moderating influence of legal framework on strategic planning and devolved service delivery effectiveness in Kenya. Hierarchical regression study.

Kasmiah, N., et al. (2024). Digital transformation in developing country public service contexts. Empirical study.

Khisro, J. (2020). Utilizing an investment instrument for digital transformation: A case study of a large Swedish municipality (pp. 71–81). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_6

Kimemia, B. W., & Amuhaya, J. (2023). Information communication technology strategy implementation on performance of Huduma Centre, a case study of Murang'a County. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2597

Kirana, N. W. I., & Majid, N. (2022). Challenges of digital transformation on good governance for improving public services quality. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2307

Koech, D., & Bett, A. (2023). Identifying the critical success factors for digital transformation strategy in the public service: Evidence from Kenya. Strategicjournals.com, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2600

Larasati, Z. W., Yuda, T. K., & Syafa'at, A. R. (2022). Digital welfare state and problem arising: An exploration and future research agenda. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(5/6), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-05-2022-0122

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818

Li, H., & Xu, J. (2024). Impact of digital government on digital transformation of enterprises from the perspective of urban economic sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(7), 2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072667

Li, Y., Fan, Y., & Nie, L. (2023). Making governance agile: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in China's local governance. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231188229

Manda, M. I. (2022). Power, politics, and the institutionalisation of information systems for promoting digital transformation in the public sector. Information Polity, 27(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-200233

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Mutuku, C. M., Wamuyu, P. K., & Oduor, C. (2023). Policy frameworks and their moderating role in digital service transformation: Evidence from Kenyan public sector. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 15(5), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2022.2088013

Myovella, G., Karaçuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856

Njoroge, J., & Mwangi, M. (2023). Implementation gaps in the Kenya Digital Masterplan 2022–2032. International Journal of Digital Government, 2(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.24018/ijdg.2023.2.1.127

Njuguna, J., & Karimi, K. (2025). The moderating role of government policy in digital public service delivery. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.1234567

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Nurfadilah, A., & Haliah, H. (2024). Public sector transformation: Increased efficiency and innovation in the digital economy. International Journal of Human, Education and Social Sciences, 2(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v2i2.2870

Nyamai, M., & Njagi, E. (2023). Empirical investigation on influence of employee skill development and continuous service improvement on service delivery effectiveness in Huduma Centres in Nairobi City County, Kenya. International Journal of Business Management Entrepreneurship and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.35942/6j0yfn43

Odhiambo, W., & Okello, B. (2019). Influence of automation systems on service delivery effectiveness in selected Huduma Centres in Kenya. Strategicjournals.com, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1258

Ojo, A., Janowski, T., & Estevez, E. (2021). Policy coordination in South Africa's e-government strategy. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101529

Reddy, K. G., & Khan, M. G. M. (2023). Constructing efficient strata boundaries in stratified sampling using survey cost. Heliyon, 9(11), e21407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21407

Setyawan, D. (2024). Digital governance and service delivery effectiveness transformation. Governance study.

Sharma, R., et al. (2023). Digital governance and service delivery effectiveness effectiveness. Strategic management perspective.

Sihombing, S., et al. (2024). Operational inefficiencies in digital public service hubs. Applied study.

Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ta'amneh, M. A., Haija, A. A., & Taamneh, A. (2023). Governance practices, service quality, and trust moderation in Jordan. GLS analysis study.

Tolbert, P. S., et al. (2021). Digital transformation in government sectors: Legislative imperatives and institutional isomorphism. Applied study.

Wei, S., Xu, D., & Liu, H. (2022). The effects of information technology capability and knowledge base on digital innovation: The moderating role of institutional environments. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2020-0324

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Mühlich, J. (2022). Public digital governance: An integrated model of digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101648

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

How to Cite

Okeyo, M., Nzioki , J., & Tuikong, S. (2026). Moderating Role of Government Policy on the Relationship Between Digital Transformation Practices and Public Service Delivery Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Huduma Centres in Nairobi Metropolitan Area, Kenya. Journal of Public Policy & Governance, 10(2), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5426

Issue

Section

Articles