Assessing Influence of Digital Data Collection Tools on the Performance of the Small-Scale Irrigation Technology Project in Ngoma District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5469Abstract
The study examined the influence of digital data collection tools on the performance of the Small-Scale Irrigation Technology (SSIT) Project in Ngoma District, Rwanda. Anchored in Systems Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, the study assessed how digital data collection tools, real-time data transmission, and interactive dashboards and reporting influenced project performance. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was employed. From a target population of 145 stakeholders, a sample of 106 respondents was selected using stratified random and convenience sampling techniques. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, ANOVA, and multiple regression, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings indicated that digital monitoring technologies positively influenced project performance, particularly by improving timeliness, accountability, resource utilization, and decision-making. High mean scores were recorded for digital data collection tools (M = 4.20), real-time data transmission (M = 4.18), and interactive dashboards (M = 4.14), indicating strong agreement among respondents regarding their contribution to monitoring efficiency. Multiple regression results showed that digital data collection tools (β = .440, p = .013), real-time data transmission (β = .264, p = .002), and interactive dashboards (β = .370, p = .004) significantly predicted project performance. Collectively, the three components explained 65.7% of the variance in project performance (R² = .657, F = 197.070, p < .001). The Durbin–Watson statistic of 1.967 indicated no problematic autocorrelation in the model. The qualitative findings further highlighted improved reporting timeliness, reduced data errors, enhanced responsiveness, greater transparency, and more informed decision-making. The study concluded that digital data collection tools were the strongest predictor of SSIT project performance, followed by interactive dashboards and real-time data transmission. These findings underscore the importance of integrating digital technologies into agricultural project monitoring and evaluation to improve data quality, operational efficiency, accountability, and the sustainability of irrigation interventions. The study recommends strengthening the use of digital data collection tools, improving rural internet connectivity, integrating interactive dashboards into district-level monitoring and evaluation systems, and providing continuous training in digital data management and analysis. It further recommends stronger stakeholder collaboration and appropriate data governance and cybersecurity measures. Future studies should examine the long-term sustainability of digital monitoring interventions, farmers’ digital readiness, the cost–benefit implications of digital technologies, and the application of predictive analytics and artificial intelligence in irrigation project management.
Keywords: Digital data collection tools; Small-scale irrigation; Project performance; Digital technology; Ngoma District.
References
Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I., & Burrell, J. (2016). The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301
Apriyanto, H., Prabowo, W. S., Laksono, R. A., Khoir, A. F., Adjie, B., Khusni, U., & Afandi, S. (2022). The development of real-time monitoring and managing information system for digitalization of plant collection data in Indonesian botanical garden. @is The Best: Accounting Information Systems and Information Technology Business Enterprise, 7(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.34010/aisthebest.v7i1.6792
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bamurigire, P., Murerwa, J., Twahirwa, E., Mtonga, K., Kellen, S., Jayavel, K., Mutanguha, P., Mushabe, S. G., Rwigema, J., & Musanase, C. (2026). Leveraging IoT-based smart irrigation systems to enhance rice productivity: A case study of smallholder farmers in the Muvumba Valley irrigation scheme, Eastern Rwanda. Advances in Agriculture, 2026, Article 5039599. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/5039599
Beach, R. H., Milliken, C., Franzen, K., & Lapidus, D. (2025). Meta-analysis of the impacts of digital information interventions on agricultural development. Global Food Security, 45, Article 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100866
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fabregas, R., Kremer, M., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice. Science, 366(6471), Article eaay3038. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3038
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). SOSIA: Small-Scale Open Source Satellite-based Irrigation Advice. https://www.fao.org/in-action/remote-sensing-for-water-productivity/applications-and-uses/applications-catalogue/product-detail/SOSIA-Small-Scale-Open-Source-Satellite-based-Irrigation-Advice_1629091/en
Harelimana, J. B., & Umugwaneza, M. (2024). The effects of monitoring and evaluation on the performance of dairy community processing centre in Rwanda. Journal of Business and Econometrics Studies, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.61440/JBES.2024.v1.09
Kabeyi, M. J. (2019). Evolution of project management, monitoring and evaluation, with historical events and projects that have shaped the development of project management as a profession. Brainae Journal of Business, Sciences and Technology, 19(2), 112–129.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Kawerau, L., Birkenberg, A., Daum, T., Butele, C. A., & Birner, R. (2024). Entering the digital research age: Investigating the effectiveness of visual digital tools in agricultural research. Field Methods, 36(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X231176693
Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
Mbarushimana, J. P., & Sanja, M. (2024). Role of monitoring tools in project performance evaluation: A case of mWater use in the evaluation of Generation Water Project implemented in Bugesera and Nyamagabe districts, Rwanda. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11(1), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i1.2851
Mugire, D., & Njenga, G. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation on performance of projects in Rwanda: A case of Rural Electricity Distribution Project in Rulindo District. Global Scientific Journal, 11(8).
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board. (n.d.). Irrigation program. https://www.rab.gov.rw/1-1/news/horticulture-program-1
Rwanda Rural Rehabilitation Initiative. (2021, September 30). Inauguration of green technology project in Ngoma District. https://www.rwarri.org/news/inauguration-of-green-technology-project-in-ngoma-district
van Besouw, J., & Bond-Barnard, T. (2021). Smart project management information systems (SPMIS) for engineering projects—Project performance monitoring and reporting. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 9(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm090104
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Article metrics
Downloads: 5
