Assessing the Socio-Economic Factors Influencing the Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Rural Rwanda: Evidence from Rwanda EICV-5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t7087Abstract
This study aimed to assess the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of improved cookstoves in rural Rwanda. The increased use of improved cooking fuels is recognized as a potential solution to alleviate pressure on forest resources, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, reduce premature deaths, and offer several economic advantages, including fuel savings through increased efficiency, time savings due to reduced cooking time and potential reductions in healthcare costs associated with indoor air pollution, among others. The study employed cross-sectional data, to analyse household factors, stove and fuel factors, and institutional factors that affect the decision of households to adopt the improved cookstoves. The sample size consisted of 12,048 households selected from cross-sectional data collected during the Fifth Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey (EICV-5). Among this sample, 31.45% were adopters while 68.55% were non-adopters of improved cookstoves. The Probit model was used to evaluate the factors influencing households’ decisions to adopt improved cookstoves, while the Tobit model was used to assess factors affecting the frequency of improved cookstove usage. The results of the study provided empirical evidence of a significant positive effect of age of the household head, education level of the household head, income, cooperative membership, access to information and social influence in enhancing the adoption of improved cookstoves. Also, the results showed that access to information, cooperative membership and type of habitat had a significant positive impact on the frequency use of the improved cookstoves. The study recommends strategic policymaking on areas that require emphasis for increasing the adoption of improved cookstoves that will help contribute to economic well-being, alleviate pressure on forest degradation, and reduce environmental and health risks associated with Household Air Pollution (HAP) in the country in general and in rural area in particular.
Key words: Adoption, improved cookstoves, household air pollution
References
Allen, T. (2015). Understanding technology adoption: The case of improved cookstoves in Bunga, Central Uganda. Lunda University, Uganda.
Baiyegunhi, L. J., & Hassan, M. B. (2014). Rural household fuel energy transition: Evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy for Sustainable Development, 20, 30–35.
Bruce, N., Aunan, K., & Rehfuess, E. (2017). Liquefied petroleum gas as a clean cooking fuel for developing countries: Implications for climate, forests and affordability. KfW Development Bank.
Démurger, S., & Fournier, M. (2011). Poverty and firewood consumption: A case study of rural households in northern China. China Economic Review, 22(4), 512–523.
Gupta, G., & Köhlin, G. (2006). Preferences for domestic fuel: Analysis with socio-economic factors and rankings in Kolkata, India. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 107–121.
Guta, D. D. (2012). Assessment of biomass fuel resource potential and utilization in Ethiopia: Sourcing strategies for renewable energies. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 2(1), 131–139.
Hall, B. H., & Khan, B. (2003). Adoption of new technology.
Hassan, L. G., Sani, N. A., Sokoto, A. M., & Tukur, U. G. (2017). Comparative studies of burning rates and water boiling time of wood charcoal and briquettes produced from carbonized Martynia annua woody shells. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(2), 21–27.
Jagger, P., & Jumbe, C. (2016). Stoves or sugar? Willingness to adopt improved cookstoves in Malawi. Energy Policy, 92, 409–419.
Koutsoyiannis, A. (2011). Theory of demand. In Modern microeconomics. Palgrave.
Kulindwa, Y. J., Lokina, R., & Ahlgren, E. O. (2018). Driving forces for households' adoption of improved cooking stoves in rural Tanzania. Energy Strategy Reviews, 20, 102–112.
Lee, T., & Gany, F. (2013). Cooking oil fumes and lung cancer: A review of the literature in the context of the U.S. population. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 15, 646–652.
Maré, M., & Annegarn, H. J. (2017). The use of willingness to pay in determining customer preferences for improved flame-based cookstove features in two South African study areas. Social Marketing Quarterly, 23(4), 335–353.
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. (2018). The fifth integrated household living conditions survey (EICV 5).
Onyeneke, R. U., Nwajiuba, C. A., Munonye, J., Uwazie, U. I., Uwajumogu, N., Uwadoka, C. O., & Aligbe, J. O. (2019). Improved cook-stoves and environmental and health outcomes: Lessons from Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3520.
Pandey, V. L., & Chaubal, A. (2011). Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(11), 4724–4731.
Poddar, M., & Chakrabarti, S. (2016). Indoor air pollution and women’s health in India: An exploratory analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 669–677.
Rahut, D. B., Ali, A., Mottaleb, K. A., & Aryal, J. P. (2020). Understanding households’ choice of cooking fuels: Evidence from urban households in Pakistan. Asian Development Review, 37(1), 185–212.
Rehfuess, E., Puzzolo, E., Stanistreet, D., Pope, D., & Bruce, N. (2014). Enablers and barriers to large-scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves: A systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639
Rehman, I. H., Kar, A., Arora, A., Pal, R., Singh, L., Tiwari, J., & Singh, V. K. (2012). Distribution of improved cook stoves: Analysis of field experiments using strategic niche management theory. Sustainability Science, 7, 227–235.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
Rwanda Energy Group. (2020). Methane gas in Rwanda. http://www.reg.rw/what-we-do/generation/methane-gas/
Rwanda Environment Management Authority. (2019). Rwanda compendium of environment statistics.
Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority. (2020). http://www.rwfa.rw/index.php?id=35
Shen, G., et al. (2014). Factors influencing the adoption and sustained use of clean fuel and cookstoves in China: A literature review.
Solomon, M., Bamossy, G. J., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. K. (2006). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Tanja, L. (2015). Factors affecting consumer’s buying decision in the selection of a coffee brand. Saimaa University of Applied Sciences.
Vigolo, V., Sallaku, R., & Testa, F. (2018). Drivers and barriers to clean cooking: A systematic literature review from a consumer behavior perspective. Sustainability, 10(11), 4322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114322
World Health Organization. (2010). Household use of solid fuels and high-temperature frying. International Agency for Research on Cancer.
World Health Organization. (2018). Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2016. https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/HAP_BoD_results_May2018_final.pdf
