Selected Factors and Adoption of Electronic Performance in Public Secondary School Teachers in Bomet Central Sub-County

Authors

  • Leonard Kipkorir Rutto The Catholic University of Eastern Africa
  • Doreen Njeje The Catholic University of Eastern Africa
  • Ruto Yano The Catholic University of Eastern Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4074

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish factors hindering teachers’ acceptance of electronic performance system used as an appraisal tool. The study was guided by the following specific research objectives: To establish effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating condition on teachers’ acceptance of electronic performance system. The study adopted a survey research design subjecting public secondary school teachers in Bomet Central sub-county. Krejcie and Morgan's table and a formula of sample size determination was used to select 196 respondents for the study. Purposive sampling technique was used to target principal, stratified sampling technique with be used to sample from each strata; Languages, Sciences, Humanities, and Creative Arts. Simple random sampling technique was used to sample respondents from each strata. The quantitative data collected was coded and analyzed using the Pearson’s (r) Correlation, regression analysis (R) and ANOVA, SPSS, tables and graphs. Regressing analysis revealed R squared of 0.702, implying that the variables used in this study; resource-based conditions, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence jointly explained 70.2 percent of the variation in the adoption of electronic performance by public secondary school teachers in Bomet Central Sub-County. The study concludes that the selected factors adopted by this study which included resource-based conditions, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence have positive and significant effect on the adoption and implementation of electronic performance by public secondary school teachers in Bomet Central Sub-county. The study thus recommends that the managements of public secondary schools in Bomet central sub county and the country at large should strive to embrace resource-based conditions, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and social influence, since they have been found to have positive effect on the adoption of electronic performance by public secondary school teachers in Bomet Central Sub-county.

Keywords: Selected Factors, Performance expectancy, Effort expectancy, Social influence, Resource-based conditions, Adoption of Electronic performance system.

Author Biographies

Leonard Kipkorir Rutto, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa

Master’s Student

Doreen Njeje , The Catholic University of Eastern Africa

Senior lecturer, School of Business

Ruto Yano, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa

Lecturer, School of Business

References

Ahmad, M. (2015) Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). A decade of validation and development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270282896

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently Asked Questions. Hum Behav & Emerg Tech, (2) 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Alraja et al., (2016). The Influence of Effort and Performance Expectancy on Employees to Adopt E-Government: Evidence from Oman. International Review of management and marketing 6(4) 930-934 www.econjournals.com

Boot et al., (2016). Technology, Gaming and Social Networking. Handbook of the psychology of Aging, (8) https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/technology-acceptance-model

Chauhan, V., Yadav, R., & Choudhary, V. (2022). Adoption of electronic banking services in India: an extension of UTAUT2 model. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 27(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-021-00095-z

Edda et al., (2020). Adoption and Impacts of Electronic Records Management Systems (ERMS) in Tanzania: Perspectives from Tanzania Public Service College.

Fedorko, I., Bačik, R., & Gavurova, B. (2021). Effort expectancy and social influence factors as main determinants of performance expectancy using electronic banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.03

Gavurova et al., (2021) Effort expectancy and Social Influence Factors as Main Determinants of Performance Expectancy Using Electronic Banking. Banks and Banks Systems. 16(2), 27-37 http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2)2021.03

Ghalandari, K. (2012). The effect of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on acceptance of e-banking services in Iran: The moderating role of age and gender. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(6), 801-807.

Hutabarat, Z., Suryawan, I. N., Andrew, R., & Akwila, F. P. (2021). Effect Of Performance Expectancy And Social Influence On Continuance Intention In OVO. Jurnal Manajemen, 25(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v25i1.707

Kipsoi, E.J, Chang’ach, J.K, Sang, H.E. (2012). Challenges Facing Adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Educational Management in Schools in Kenya. Journal of Sociological Research, 3(1), ISSN: 1948-5468. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v3i1.1882

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Education and psychological measurement. 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., Luo, C., Zhi-wu, X., & Lu, M. (2021). Factors predicting the behavioral adoption of Electronic Payment System (EPS). International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), 13(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2021010105

Rahi, S., Mansour, M. M. O., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032

Ronoh, E. (2018). Teachers Union Opposes TSC’s Appraisal tool. Hivisasa. https://hivisasa.com/posts/teachers-union-opposes-tscs-appraisal-tool

Schmidt et al., (2020). The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected recent Advances and Applications. Eur J Psychol. 16(3) 352-356. Doi 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107

Sung, H. N., Jeong, D. Y., Jeong, Y. S., & Shin, J. I. (2015). The relationship among self-efficacy, social influence, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and behavioral intention in mobile learning service. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, 8(9), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2015.8.9.21

Surendran, P. (2012), Technology Acceptance Model: A survey of Literature, International Journal of Business and social Research (IJBSR), 2(4)

Sutton, S. (2001). Health Behavior: Psychological Theories. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03872-9

Yang et al., (2009). Social Influence on Knowledge Workers Adoption of innovation information Technology. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 50.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-26

How to Cite

Rutto, . L. K. ., Njeje , D. ., & Yano, R. . (2022). Selected Factors and Adoption of Electronic Performance in Public Secondary School Teachers in Bomet Central Sub-County. Journal of Information, Technology and Data Science, 6(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4074

Issue

Section

Articles