Perceived Trail Accessibility and Competitive Advantage in Kenya’s Adventure Tourism Sector

Authors

  • Jane Muthoni Gatonye Zetech University, Kenya
  • Catherine Njoki Chege Zetech University, Kenya
  • Samuel Macharia Zetech University, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2590

Abstract

Kenya's adventure tourism sector has strong potential because of its exceptional ecological diversity. However, the sector faces an "Infrastructure Paradox" where world-class natural assets are undermined by inconsistent accessibility standards. Guided by the Resource-Based View and Expectation Disconfirmation Theory, this study examined the effect of perceived trail accessibility on competitive advantage in Kenya’s adventure tourism sector. The study sought to determine the effect of perceived trail accessibility on the competitive advantage of Kenya’s adventure tourism sector. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed, targeting a population of active hikers and adventure tourism stakeholders. A sample of 400 hikers was selected using convenience sampling for the quantitative phase, while 12 stakeholders were purposively selected for qualitative interviews. Data was collected using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interview guides. Structural model results using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) showed that perceived trail accessibility did not have a statistically significant direct effect on competitive advantage (β = 0.026, p = 0.663). Scenic beauty (β = 0.522, p < 0.001) and trail length (β = 0.211, p < 0.001) emerged as the primary determinants of competitive advantage. These results suggest that trail accessibility functions as a threshold resource. It is necessary to prevent visitor dissatisfaction, but does not by itself create a unique competitive edge. Qualitative findings corroborated this, identifying degraded feeder roads and information gaps as key barriers to improving the visitor experience. The study concluded that while accessibility is essential for operational viability, it functioned as a threshold resource rather than a strategic driver. It recommended that the Ministry of Tourism and wildlife management agencies adopt a Standardized Signage Protocol and a national trail classification framework based on international best practices to align infrastructure quality with the high value of Kenya’s natural landscapes.

Keywords: adventure tourism; competitive advantage; perceived trail accessibility; Resource-Based View; mixed methods

Author Biographies

Jane Muthoni Gatonye, Zetech University, Kenya

Zetech University, Kenya

Catherine Njoki Chege, Zetech University, Kenya

Zetech University, Kenya

Samuel Macharia, Zetech University, Kenya

Zetech University, Kenya

References

Arici, H. E., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2025). What are the most influential drivers of tourism destination competitiveness? Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 36, Article 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2025.100990

Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2020). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (6th ed.). Pearson.

Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-based theory and the value creation framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936-1953. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211016960

Chai, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). Network-place frameworks for recreational infrastructure: Moving from access to experience. Tourism Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104990

Chan, W. C., Ibrahim, W. H. W., Lo, M. C., & Mohamad, A. A. (2023). Assessing the influence of hard and soft infrastructure on perceived destination competitiveness: Perspective from visitors in Sarawak. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(2), 761-786.

Chin, C. H., Chan, W. C., Ming, L., & Chin, C. L. (2025). Revealing the competitiveness of rural tourism: Exploring tangible and intangible resources in Sarawak (Malaysia) and Henan Province (China). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 58(1), 18-31.

Cho, J.-W. (2024). Seoul Trail hike gives international students taste of city's greener side. Korea JoongAng Daily.

Crouch, G. I., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1999). Tourism, competitiveness, and societal prosperity. Journal of Business Research, 44(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00196-3

Eichelberger, S., Peters, M., Pikkemaat, B., & Chan, C. S. (2021). Retelling the story of mountain tourism in Austria: Residents’ perspectives on the future of their destination. Sustainability, 13(24), 13745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413745

Gitau, B. N., Misiko, A. J., & Ndivo, R. M. (2023). Contribution of adventure recreation infrastructure to sustainable rural livelihood in Nyeri, Kenya. African Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 2(1), 35-43.

Goffi, G., Cucculelli, M., & Masiero, L. (2019). Fostering tourism destination competitiveness in developing countries: The role of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.208

Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M. R., Diaz-Fernandez, M. C., & Pulido-Pavon, N. (2023). Tourist destination competitiveness: An international approach through the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index. Tourism Management Perspectives, 47, 101127.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM (2nd ed.). European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.

Hunan Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism. (2023). Huangshan tourism transport-tourism projects and cableway impact. Hunan Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism.

Jarrad, A., & Davies, K. (2024). The evolution of nature-based tourism: Management, policy, and practice. Routledge.

Jeong, M., Kim, K.-C., & Kim, H.-W. (2022). Understanding the accessibility of urban parks and connectivity of green spaces in single-person household distribution: Case study of Incheon, South Korea. Land, 11(9), 1441.

Kahangirwe, P., Vanclay, F., & Arts, J. (2025). Using environmental and social impact assessment to improve tourism infrastructure projects in protected areas. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. Advance online publication.

Kambaga, D., & Omare, M. (2023). Perceived influence of infrastructure and security levels on tourism development rate in Kiambu County. TUK Repository.

Kenya Wildlife Service. (2023). Kenya Wildlife Service annual report 2022/2023. The National Treasury.

Kozak, M., & Rimmington, M. (2000). Tourist satisfaction with Mallorca, Spain, as an off-season holiday destination. Journal of Travel Research, 38(3), 260-269.

Mandić, A., Jakelić, M., & Šimundić, B. (2021). Exploring the determinants of destination choice: The role of nature-based tourism. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 34, 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100378

Njuguna, S. (2024, May 22). Kenya’s tourism infrastructure second worst in Africa. Kenyans.co.ke. https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/100944-kenyas-tourism-infrastructure-second-worst-africa-report

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.

Vanhove, N. (2022). The economics of tourism destinations: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Elsevier.

World Tourism Organization. (2025). Adventure tourism competitiveness in emerging African markets. UNWTO.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Gatonye, J. M., Chege, C. N., & Macharia, S. (2026). Perceived Trail Accessibility and Competitive Advantage in Kenya’s Adventure Tourism Sector. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 9(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2590

Issue

Section

Articles