Does Slow Accommodation Matter for Sustainable Tourism? Evidence from A Rural Destination in Kenya

Authors

  • Pleasure Chebus Moi University
  • Dr. Ondabu Kiage Moi University
  • Dr. Wendy Rop Moi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3177

Abstract

This study examined whether slow accommodation including homestays, eco‑lodges, camping, and cultural huts contributes to sustainable tourism outcomes in Baringo County, a rural destination in Kenya with high tourism potential but persistently low performance. Despite possessing globally significant biodiversity and cultural assets, Baringo County recorded only 25,071 visitors in 2024, down from 74,569 in 2018. The conventional tourism model is characterized by short stays, economic leakage, and limited community engagement. Slow accommodation has been proposed as an alternative, but empirical evidence from sub‑Saharan Africa is lacking. A mixed‑methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected from 267 tourists via a structured questionnaire (response rate 75.2%). Qualitative data came from semi‑structured interviews with 12 tourism service providers and government officials. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to test the contribution of slow accommodation to sustainable tourism outcomes, controlling for demographic variables. Slow accommodation contributed significantly to sustainable tourism outcomes (β = 0.161, p = 0.002), though the effect was smaller than that of slow transportation or activities. Tourists showed strong preferences for camping (mean = 4.09), locally‑inspired accommodation (4.02), and homestays (4.01). Qualitative findings revealed that homestays enhance economic retention and cultural exchange, eco‑lodges promote environmental stewardship, and cultural huts preserve heritage. However, the attitude‑behaviour gap persists: some tourists choose slow accommodation for non‑sustainability reasons (e.g., cost, novelty) and behave resource‑intensively. Slow accommodation contributes meaningfully to sustainable tourism outcomes, but its potential is maximised only when complemented by tourist education, visible sustainability features, and integrated product design. The BUNON framework (Balance, Uniqueness, Nurture, Ownership, non‑haste) is introduced as a practical tool. Policymakers should integrate slow accommodation into county tourism strategies, provide incentives for homestays and eco‑lodges, and invest in pre‑arrival visitor education.

Keywords: slow accommodation, sustainable tourism, homestays, eco‑lodges, Baringo County, Kenya, BUNON framework

Author Biographies

Pleasure Chebus, Moi University

Department of Business, Tourism and Hospitality, Rongo, Kenya

Dr. Ondabu Kiage , Moi University

Department of Tourism and Events Management, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

Dr. Wendy Rop, Moi University

Department of Tourism and Events Management, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

References

Balaban, D., & Keller, J. (2024). Systematic review of slow tourism literature. Tourism Management Perspectives, 50, 101 112.

Baringo County Government. (2023). County tourism statistical abstract 2022. Baringo: Department of Tourism.

Buckley, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 528 546.

Caffyn, A. (2012). Advocating and implementing slow tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 37(1), 77 80.

Chi, X., & Han, H. (2024). Slow tourism and sustainable lodging. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(4), 712 730.

Dickinson, J. E., & Lumsdon, L. M. (2010). Slow travel and tourism. Earthscan.

Eunkyeong, J. (2021). Slow tourism: A means end approach to the motivations of slow travellers. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100798.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Addison Wesley.

Fullagar, S., Markwell, K., & Wilson, E. (Eds.). (2012). Slow tourism: Experiences and mobilities. Channel View Publications.

Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2019). Tourism and global environmental change. (Classic for environmental costs).

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59 82.

Hergesell, A., & Dickinger, A. (2013). Environmentally friendly holiday transport mode choices among students. Tourism Review, 68(4), 23 36.

Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2020). Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19.* (Great for socio-cultural costs).

Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2014). The attitude behaviour gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 76 95.

Kebete, W. (2021). Promoting slow tourism to wrestle the challenges of shorter length of tourist stay. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 19(4), 482 498.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2025). Economic survey 2025. Nairobi: KNBS.

Lenzen, M., et al. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 522 528.

Matos, R. (2004). Slowtels: A new concept in Alpine tourism. Tourism Review, 59(3), 29 33.

Serra Cantallops, A., & Ramon Cardona, J. (2017). Overtourism: A literature review. Sustainability, 9(12), 2261.

Tihilä, M. (2015). Slow accommodation: A conceptual framework. University of Helsinki.

Timms, B. F., & Conway, D. (2012). Slow tourism at the Caribbean’s geographical margins. Tourism Geographies, 14(3), 396 418.

UNWTO & UNEP. (2005). Making tourism more sustainable: A guide for policy makers. UNWTO.

UNWTO (2023). World Tourism Barometer. (United Nations World Tourism Organization)

UNWTO. (2019). International tourism highlights 2019. UNWTO.

WTTC (2024). Economic Impact Report. (World Travel & Tourism Council)

Yuetao, W., Li, X., & Zhang, J. (2023). Sustainable tourism models: A systematic review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101058.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Chebus, P., Kiage , O., & Rop, W. (2026). Does Slow Accommodation Matter for Sustainable Tourism? Evidence from A Rural Destination in Kenya. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 9(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3177

Issue

Section

Articles