Extent and Consequence of Learning Management Systems Usage: An Experience from College Students in the United States
Abstract
This study evaluated the extent and consequence of learning management systems usage by college students in the US. The learning management system (LMS) has become a critical tool for nearly all institutions of higher education, and a driving force in online learning. There was a time in the not-so-distant past when making use of an LMS was taken into consideration very ingenious. Recognizing the development and fostering of the LMS is a tipping stone to understanding how professors may choose to adopt various other technical and also pedagogical innovations. The adaptation of web sources has been classified a technical change as well as has transformed exactly how we consider and also make use of information. This seems especially noticeable in the growth of educational tools and products that are used in online as well as web-based programs. Although the internet has actually turned into a scholastic town where people learn and also generate, a substantial number of university administrators as well as faculty continue focusing their vision on the physical school traditional. This research study was a literature based. The outcomes recognized the attributes that were used most regularly and just how usage had changed gradually. Additionally, the study contrasted the use information for face-to-face and also on-line courses to establish if there are differences in LMS use because of training course modality. Based upon this, it is possible to better recognize the duty the LMS plays in college and online understanding, to notify development of next generation finding out systems or various other ingenious technologies. The research likewise found that 99% of higher education establishments in US had an LMS in position, and also the LMS was utilized by 85% of professors as well as 83% of students.
Key Words: Extent, Consequence, LMS, Usage, College students
References
Malikowski, S. R. (2010). Factors relted to breadth of use in course management systems. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 81-86.
Janossy, J., & Hover, T. (2010, March). Proposed model for evaluating C/LMS usage. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2979- 2986). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Liu, D. Y. T., Atif, A., Froissard, J. C., & Richards, D. (2019, January). An enhanced learning analytics plugin for Moodle: student engagement and personalised intervention.
In ASCILITE 2015-Australasian Society for Computers in Learning and Tertiary Education, Conference Proceedings.
Rhode, J., Richter, S., Gowen, P., Miller, T., & Wills, C. (2017). Understanding Faculty Use of the Learning Management System. Online Learning, 21(3), 68-86.
Broadbent, J. (2016). Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than frequency of use of the learning management system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4).
Alperin, M., Lloyd, L. M., McCormick, L. C., Bergland, B., Carvalho, M., Tripathi, M., ... & Miner, K. R. (2017). Distance Education And Learning: An innovative approach to extending workforce training capacity. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 3(1_suppl), 40S-46S.
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655-679.
Mims, N. G., & McKenzie, B. (2016, March). Using Social Media in Online Education Courses. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 305-311). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X., & Williams, M. (2018). The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 311-319.
Braender, L. M., & Naples, M. I. (2019). Evaluating the impact and determinants of student team performance: Using LMS and CATME data. Journal of Information Systems Education, 24(4), 3.
Merola, R. (2017). What Does Data Tell Us about Cross-border Online Learning?. International Higher Education, (89), 21-23.
Fuller, D., Norby, R. F., Pearce, K., & Strand, S. (2010). Internet teaching by style: Profiling the on-line professor. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 71-85.
Burnett, P. C. (2013). The impact of teacher feedback on student self-talk and self-concept in reading and mathematics. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 11-16.
Burniske, R. W., & Monke, L. (2011). Digital walls: Learning to teach in a post-modern world.
Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118-132.
Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and information technologies, 22(2), 623-645.
Islim, O. F. (2018). Technology-supported collaborative concept maps in classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 131-143.
Berking, P., & Gallagher, S. (2016). Choosing a learning management system. Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Initiative. https://www. adlnet. gov/public/.../ChoosingAnLMS. docx. Accessed, 5(05), 2017.
Lever-Duffy, J., McDonald, J. B., & Mizell, A. P. (2013). Teaching and Learning with. Technology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
Rhode, J., Richter, S., Gowen, P., Miller, T., & Wills, C. (2017). Understanding Faculty Use of the Learning Management System. Online Learning, 21(3), 68-86.
Ilyas, M., Kadir, K. A., & Adnan, Z. (2017). Demystifying the learning management system (LMS): journey from e-learning to the strategic role. development, 9(9).
Ilyas, M., Kadir, K. A., & Adnan, Z. (2017). Demystifying the learning management system (LMS): journey from e-learning to the strategic role. development, 9(9).
