Exploring How Audit Quality Bridges the Link between Board Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Financial Reporting Quality: Empirical Evidence from Kenyan Commercial Banks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4427Abstract
Financial reporting quality (FRQ) within the banking industry is of particular interest due to the importance of transparency, market confidence and financial stability. Banks are particularly prone to FRQ issues due to the high level of estimation within the accounting process such as loan loss provisions (LLP). In addition, low FRQ may mask risk and pose a threat to financial stability. This study sought to establish the mediating effect of audit quality on the relationship between board audit committee financial expertise and financial reporting quality (FRQ) among banks in Kenya. Anchored on Agency Theory, Stakeholder Theory and Resource Dependence Theory, the study adopted a positivist philosophy and an explanatory longitudinal panel research design. Secondary data were obtained from audited financial statements, annual reports, external audit reports and Central Bank of Kenya publications covering 2015–2024, and all analyses were based on this full balanced panel of 330 observations. Financial reporting quality was measured using absolute discretionary loan-loss provisions derived from a bank-specific loan-loss-provision model, with lower values indicating less reporting discretion and higher financial reporting quality. Audit quality was proxied by external audit fees. Mediation was tested using the Sobel test. The mediation results demonstrated that audit quality mediate the relationship between financial expertise (indirect β = 0.008, p < 0.05), meeting frequency (indirect β = 0.007, p < 0.05), independence (indirect β = 0.005, p < 0.05) and size (indirect β = 0.005, p < .05) and financial reporting quality. The study recommends that banks and regulators should strengthen substantive board audit committee financial expertise and engagement between Board Audit Committees and external auditors. The findings have the potential to provide policymakers and regulators with information highlighting the significance of strong audit board committee in the process of enhancing financial reporting quality.
Keywords: Quality Audit, Audit Fees, Dimensions of Board Audit Committee, Quality of Financial Reporting, Discretionary Loan-Loss Write-offs, Mediation, Kenyan Banks
References
Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 47–66.
Agyei-Mensah, B. K. (2019). The effect of audit committee effectiveness and audit quality on corporate voluntary disclosure quality. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 10(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-04-2018-0102
Al Farooque, O., Buachoom, W., & Sun, L. (2020). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance – emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(1), 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-10-2018-0079
Alareeni, B. A. (2019). The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 6–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-05-2017-1559
Amin, A., Lukviarman, N., Suhardjanto, D., & Setiany, E. (2018). Audit committee characteristics and audit-earnings quality: Empirical evidence of the company with concentrated ownership. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7(Suppl. 1), 18–33.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009
Central Bank of Kenya. (2013). Prudential guidelines for institutions licensed under the Banking Act. https://www.centralbank.go.ke
Central Bank of Kenya. (2018). Bank supervision annual report 2018. https://www.centralbank.go.ke
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Ghafran, C., & O'Sullivan, N. (2017). The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees. The British Accounting Review, 49(6), 578–593.
Hasan, S., Kassim, A. A. M., & Hamid, M. A. A. (2020). The impact of audit quality, audit committee and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(5), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.10136
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745
Islam, M., Slof, J., & Albitar, K. (2023). The mediation effect of audit committee quality and internal audit function quality on the firm size–financial reporting quality nexus. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5), 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-06-2022-0153
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z. (2013). Is corporate governance a determinant of auditor choice? Evidence from Turkey. Ege Academic Review, 13(2), 273–284.
Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Stewart, J. (2010). Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 171–195.
Khudhair, D. Z., Al-Zubaidi, F. K. A., & Raji, A. A. (2019). The effect of board characteristics and audit committee characteristics on audit quality. Management Science Letters, 9(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.11.012
Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(02)00059-9
Krishnamoorthy, G., Bruynseels, L., De Groote, S., Wright, A. M., & Van Peteghem, M. (2023). The accounting financial expertise of the audit committee chair and oversight effectiveness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-19-088
Lin, J. W., Li, J. F., & Yang, J. S. (2006). The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9), 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610705019
Mansor, N., Che-Ahmad, A., Ahmad-Zaluki, N. A., & Osman, A. H. (2013). Corporate governance and earnings management: A study on the Malaysian family and non-family owned PLCs. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00238-4
Mardessi, S. (2022). Audit committee and financial reporting quality: The moderating effect of audit quality. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 368–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-01-2021-0010
Mitnick, B. M. (1973). Fiduciary rationality and public policy: The theory of agency and some consequences. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1020859
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Qawqzeh, H. K., Endut, W. A., & Rashid, N. (2021). Board components and quality of financial reporting: Mediating effect of audit quality. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.47750/CIBG.2021.27.02.023
Qawqzeh, H. K., Endut, W. A., Rashid, N., & Dakhlallh, M. M. (2020). Impact of the external auditor’s effectiveness on the financial reporting quality: The mediating effect of audit quality. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 1197–1208.
Rahman, M. M. (2024). The effect of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 14(1).
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
Suryanto, T., Thalassinos, J. E., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2017). Board characteristics, audit committee and audit quality: The case of Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 5(3), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/134
Vafeas, N. (2005). Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1093–1122.
Vafeas, N., & Waegelein, J. F. (2007). The association between audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-0012-9
